[et_pb_section fb_built=\u00bb1″ _builder_version=\u00bb4.0.6″ collapsed=\u00bboff\u00bb][et_pb_row _builder_version=\u00bb4.0.6″ background_size=\u00bbinitial\u00bb background_position=\u00bbtop_left\u00bb background_repeat=\u00bbrepeat\u00bb width=\u00bb91%\u00bb custom_padding=\u00bb0px|||||\u00bb collapsed=\u00bboff\u00bb][et_pb_column type=\u00bb4_4″ _builder_version=\u00bb3.25″ custom_padding=\u00bb|||\u00bb custom_padding__hover=\u00bb|||\u00bb][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00bb4.0.6″ text_font=\u00bbOpen Sans||||||||\u00bb text_font_size=\u00bb16px\u00bb header_2_text_color=\u00bb#002b52″ header_2_line_height=\u00bb1.1em\u00bb background_size=\u00bbinitial\u00bb background_position=\u00bbtop_left\u00bb background_repeat=\u00bbrepeat\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00bb0″]<\/p>\n
Luis S\u00e1nchez,<\/strong>\u00a0Director of the Commercial Department of\u00a0Medina Cuadros<\/strong>\u00a0In Granada, he participated in a round table discussion\u00a0Law school<\/strong>\u00a0of the Andalusian city, organized by the\u00a0Professional Association of the Judiciary<\/strong>\u00a0(APM), where he analyzed in depth the\u00a0remuneration of Executive Directors<\/strong>\u00a0before the Sentence of the\u00a0Supreme Court of February 26, 2018.<\/strong><\/p>\n This\u00a0"controversy"<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0Sentence, as developed\u00a0Luis S\u00e1nchez<\/strong>\u00a0At the beginning of his speech: "he considered, contrary to the majority doctrine, that the remuneration of the Managing Directors should be subject, cumulatively, to the requirements demanded of the directors,\u00a0in their capacity as such<\/strong>\u201c,<\/em>\u00a0collected all of this in the article\u00a0217 of the Capital Companies Act.<\/strong><\/p>\n Luis S\u00e1nchez<\/strong>\u00a0He continued his presentation by explaining that "to date, it has been maintained that the\u00a0Managing Directors or Executives<\/strong>\u00a0they just had to stick to what\u00a0regulated in article 249 LSC<\/strong>, that is, the signing of a contract between the Company and the Managing Director or Executive, with a reinforced majority of 2\/3, the affected party abstaining from participating in the debate and approval thereof, and the minutes must record the\u00a0copy of said contract.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n He\u00a0Director of Commercial<\/strong>\u00a0from the Granada office, detailed in this round table, that the\u00a0Supreme Court,<\/strong>\u00a0with the Judgment of February 26, 2018, considers that together with these requirements, the following are also required:\u00a0administrator,<\/strong>\u00a0in his\u00a0condition of such,<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0"so you should have your\u00a0statutory reflection in the methods and bases of remuneration<\/strong>, among which this precept or any other that may be accepted by the\u00a0General Meeting\u201d.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cIn such a way that\u00a0without the statutory provision<\/strong>\u00a0and later\u00a0approval of the General Meeting<\/strong>\u00a0of the salary caps, the remuneration of the\u00a0Counselor,<\/strong>\u00a0with the consequences that this entails, in particular,\u00a0those of a fiscal nature.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n This forum served to present the detailed vision of the different legal professionals regarding the\u00a0STS of February 26, 2018<\/strong>, debating new and controversial legal issues. In addition to\u00a0Luis S\u00e1nchez,<\/strong>\u00a0Director of Mercantil de Medina Cuadros in Granada; the panel members were:\u00a0Maria Jose Fernandez Alcala,<\/strong>\u00a0Magistrate Judge of Territorial Assignment of the Commercial Court of Granada;\u00a0Cristina Palma L\u00f3pez,<\/strong>\u00a0Commercial Registrar of Granada, and,\u00a0Antonio Juan Garc\u00eda Amezcua,<\/strong>\u00a0Notary of Granada.<\/p>\n The presentation was of great interest to the audience that gathered at the\u00a0Auditorium of the Faculty of Law of Granada<\/strong>Among the attendees were professionals from all areas of law: judges, registrars, notaries, lawyers, and also university students.<\/p>\n